Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Avoiding foregone conclusions: geometric and foundational analysis of paradoxes of finite additivity

Goldstein, Michael

Authors



Abstract

We consider an example in which the use of finitely additive probabilities leads to the seemingly paradoxical conclusion that we may reason to a foregone conclusion. We give an informal treatment of this paradox. We then develop a geometric approach which formalises this treatment, and offers a foundational resolution of the problem. We discuss this approach both in the context of assessing the value of such paradoxical data and also when used for finite approximation.

Citation

Goldstein, M. (2001). Avoiding foregone conclusions: geometric and foundational analysis of paradoxes of finite additivity. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 94(1), 73-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-3758%2800%2900229-9

Journal Article Type Article
Publication Date Mar 1, 2001
Deposit Date Mar 25, 2008
Journal Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference
Print ISSN 0378-3758
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 94
Issue 1
Pages 73-87
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-3758%2800%2900229-9
Keywords Finite additivity, Geometric conditioning, Temporal coherence, Value of information.