Williams, Lisa A. and Brosnan, Sarah F. and Clay, Zanna (2020) 'Anthropomorphism in comparative affective science : advocating a mindful approach.', Neuroscience & biobehavioral reviews., 115 . pp. 299-307.
Anthropomorphism is the attribution of human-like capacities and traits to non-human entities. Anthropomorphism is ubiquitous in everyday life and in scientific domains, operating both implicitly and explicitly as a function of the human lens through which we view the world. A rich history of work in psychology, animal behavior, cognitive science, and philosophy has highlighted the negative and, to a lesser degree, the positive implications of anthropomorphism. In this article, we aim to provide a nuanced perspective of how anthropomorphism impacts the work of comparative affective science. Specifically, we discuss three domains of empirical inquiry in which lessons can be drawn about the benefits and pitfalls of anthropomorphism: responses to death, inequity aversion, and prosocial behavior. On balance, we advocate a mindful approach to anthropomorphizing in comparative affective science, and comparative science more generally.
|Full text:||Publisher-imposed embargo until 01 June 2021. |
(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Available under License - Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
File format - PDF (3099Kb)
|Publisher Web site:||https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.05.014|
|Publisher statement:||© 2020 This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/|
|Date accepted:||26 May 2020|
|Date deposited:||09 June 2020|
|Date of first online publication:||01 June 2020|
|Date first made open access:||01 June 2021|
Save or Share this output
|Look up in GoogleScholar|