Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

The British Women's Suffrage Movement and the Practice of Petitioning, 1890-1914

Miller, Henry

The British Women's Suffrage Movement and the Practice of Petitioning, 1890-1914 Thumbnail


Authors



Abstract

Through an examination of the women's suffrage movement, this article reassesses the place of petitioning within late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century British political culture. While critical of their Victorian predecessors’ reliance on petitions, the Edwardian women's suffrage movement did not abandon petitioning, but reinvented it. Rather than presenting a polarized view of relations between suffragettes and suffragists, the article shows how both operated on a spectrum of direct action politics through petitioning. Militants and constitutionalists pioneered new, although different, modes of petitioning that underpinned broader repertoires of popular politics, adapting this venerable practice to a nascent mass democracy. The article then situates suffrage campaigners’ reinvention of petitioning within a broader political context. The apparent decline of petitioning, long noted by scholars, is reframed as the waning of the classic model of mass petitioning parliament associated with Victorian pressure groups. The early twentieth century was a crucial period for the reshaping of petitioning as a tool for political participation and expression through myriad subscriptional forms, rather than primarily through the medium of parliamentary petitions.

Citation

Miller, H. (2021). The British Women's Suffrage Movement and the Practice of Petitioning, 1890-1914. Historical Journal, 64(2), 332-356. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0018246x20000035

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Feb 1, 2020
Online Publication Date Apr 23, 2020
Publication Date 2021-03
Deposit Date Oct 13, 2020
Publicly Available Date Oct 23, 2020
Journal Historical Journal
Print ISSN 0018-246X
Electronic ISSN 1469-5103
Publisher Cambridge University Press
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 64
Issue 2
Pages 332-356
DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/s0018246x20000035

Files




You might also like



Downloadable Citations