Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

'A 'Margin of Appreciation' in the internal market: lessons from the European Court of Human Rights'

Sweeney, James A.

'A 'Margin of Appreciation' in the internal market: lessons from the European Court of Human Rights' Thumbnail


Authors

James A. Sweeney



Abstract

This article charts the interplay between universality and particularism in the approach of the European Court of Justice to national restrictions upon the four freedoms. Comparisons are made with the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. It is shown that both courts allow a national 'margin of appreciation' within which overlapping European and local public interests can be balanced. The article draws inspiration from research into the impact of the margin of appreciation upon the universality of human rights in order to understand the potential of the doctrine for the enlarged European Union. The doctrine is placed within a normative framework based upon the European Union as an 'essentially contested' project. The use of the doctrine by the European Court of Justice is analysed then in the light of this framework, with particular emphasis placed upon the existence of outer limits to the doctrine, and the factors that guide its width.

Citation

Sweeney, J. A. (2007). 'A 'Margin of Appreciation' in the internal market: lessons from the European Court of Human Rights'. Legal issues of European integration, 34(1), 27-52

Journal Article Type Article
Publication Date Jan 1, 2007
Deposit Date Mar 27, 2008
Publicly Available Date Oct 14, 2016
Journal Legal Issues of Economic Integration
Print ISSN 0377-0915
Electronic ISSN 0377-0915
Publisher Kluwer Law International
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 34
Issue 1
Pages 27-52
Keywords Margin of appreciation, Cultural relativism, Free movement, EC law.
Publisher URL http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/productinfo.php?pubcode=LEIE

Files

Published Journal Article (120 Kb)
PDF

Copyright Statement
Reprinted from Legal issues of economic integration, 34(1), 2007, 27-52 with permission of Kluwer Law International.





You might also like



Downloadable Citations