Campbell, D. and Devenney, J. P. (2006) 'Damages at the borders of legal reasoning.', Cambridge law journal., 65 (1). pp. 208-225.
IN Borders (U.K.) Ltd. and others v. Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis and another, the Court of Appeal has, yet again, succumbed to the “temptation to do justice” by further extending to claimants a disgorgement remedy on the claimed authority of A.G. v. Blake (Jonathan Cape Ltd. Third Party). We say “claimed authority” because, yet again, the extension of the disgorgement remedy is impossible to justify using legal argument respectful of precedent, for such argument is subordinated to the direct “pursuit of the justice of the outcome” (para. ).
|Full text:||PDF - Published Version (204Kb)|
|Publisher Web site:||http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0008197306007094|
|Publisher statement:||Copyright © Cambridge Law Journal and Contributors 2006|
|Record Created:||12 Aug 2008|
|Last Modified:||24 Aug 2011 16:49|
|Social bookmarking:||Export: EndNote, Zotero | BibTex|
|Usage statistics||Look up in GoogleScholar | Find in a UK Library|