We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

Durham Research Online
You are in:

Standing surety in Europe : common core or Tower of Babel ?

Kenny, M. (2007) 'Standing surety in Europe : common core or Tower of Babel ?', Modern law review., 70 (2). pp. 175-196.


This article analyses the treatment of non-professional suretyship agreements across the EU in the context provided by Commission initiatives aimed firstly at creating a single market in financial services and secondly at improving the coherence of European private law. Predictably, given their polycontextual function, we are confronted with starkly divergent national approaches towards such agreements: a `Tower of Babel' rather than a `common core'. The article proceeds to consider how we may see elements of commonality arising through the tension between the differing national approaches - seen in terms of a Unitary Network. In the course of this analysis the treble paradox of surety protection is described. The article finishes with a prediction of the relevance of a dual-track strategy in this field: involving measures of sector-specific, vertical harmonisation, and a programme of common-law style, non-legislative harmonisation through judicial convergence.

Item Type:Article
Keywords:Suretyship agreements, European Private law, Polycontextual law.
Full text:Full text not available from this repository.
Publisher Web site:
Record Created:11 Aug 2008
Last Modified:12 Feb 2010 12:42

Social bookmarking: del.icio.usConnoteaBibSonomyCiteULikeFacebookTwitterExport: EndNote, Zotero | BibTex
Look up in GoogleScholar | Find in a UK Library