Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

Assessment of progress tests.

McHarg, J. and Bradley, P. and Chamberlain, S. and Ricketts, C. and Searle, J. and McLachlan, J. C. (2005) 'Assessment of progress tests.', Medical education., 39 (2). pp. 221-227.

Abstract

Background Progress testing is a form of longitudinal examination which, in principle, samples at regular intervals from the complete domain of knowledge considered a requirement for medical students on completion of the undergraduate programme. Over the course of the programme students improve their scores on the test, enabling them, as well as staff, to monitor their progress. Aim We aimed to review methods which have been used to assess the results of individual tests, and to make recommendations on best practice. Discussion In assessing progress tests, there are a variety of choices that must be made. These include whether the test is norm- or criterion-referenced; whether marking is negative or 'number-right'; whether the grades are reported on a continuous or a discontinuous scale, and whether the grades are weighted towards the most recent observations, or the entire set of grades is used to determine the final grade. Grade boundary setting in the context of progress tests is also considered, using a mathematical model to predict the consequences of different approaches. The relationships between boundary setting, progression and remediation rules are considered. Conclusions We concluded that norm referencing is preferable to criterion referencing, negative marking preferable to number-right marking, a discontinuous scale preferable to a continuous scale and that grades should be weighted to favour the most recent outcomes, although there should still be a degree of persistence (earlier grades should not disappear all together). Grade boundaries should be established with regard to rules on remediation and progression.

Item Type:Article
Full text:Full text not available from this repository.
Publisher Web site:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02060.x
Record Created:10 May 2007
Last Modified:01 Feb 2011 10:30

Social bookmarking: del.icio.usConnoteaBibSonomyCiteULikeFacebookTwitterExport: EndNote, Zotero | BibTex
Usage statisticsLook up in GoogleScholar | Find in a UK Library