Reader, C. S. (2007) 'The other side of agency.', Philosophy., 82 (4). pp. 579-604.
In our philosophical tradition and our wider culture, we tend to think of persons as agents. This agential conception is flattering, but in this paper I will argue that it conceals a more complex truth about what persons are. In 1. I set the issues in context. In 2. I critically explore four features commonly presented as fundamental to personhood in versions of the agential conception: action, capability, choice and independence. In 3. I argue that each of these agential features presupposes a non-agential feature: agency presupposes patiency, capability presupposes incapability, choice presupposes necessity and independence presupposes dependency. In 4. I argue that such non-agential features, as well as being implicit within the agential conception, are as apt to be constitutive of personhood as agential features, and in 5. I conclude.
|Full text:||PDF - Published Version (121Kb)|
|Publisher Web site:||http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0031819107000162|
|Publisher statement:||This paper has been published by Cambridge University Press in "Philosophy" (82:4 (2007) 579-604). http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=1447396 Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 2007.|
|Record Created:||23 May 2008|
|Last Modified:||06 Sep 2011 11:55|
|Social bookmarking:||Export: EndNote, Zotero | BibTex|
|Usage statistics||Look up in GoogleScholar | Find in a UK Library|