Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

Comment on Van De Ven and Johnson's 'Engaged scholarship : nice try, but...'

McKelvey, B. (2006) 'Comment on Van De Ven and Johnson's 'Engaged scholarship : nice try, but...'.', Academy of management review., 31 (4). pp. 822-829.

Abstract

Practitioners find little value in academic research. Some see it as a knowledge flow problem; others see practitioner and academic knowledge as unrelated. Van de Venand Johnson propose a pluralistic collective of researchers and practitioners using "engaged scholarship" and intellectual arbitrage to create practitioner-meaningful research. It's a nice dream, but not a solution; bias, disciplines, and particularism remain. Neither discipline-centric nor practitioner-driven research offers a solution. Earthquake science offers a better model for business school research.

Item Type:Article
Full text:Full text not available from this repository.
Publisher Web site:UNSPECIFIED
Record Created:27 Aug 2008
Last Modified:08 Nov 2010 14:25

Social bookmarking: del.icio.usConnoteaBibSonomyCiteULikeFacebookTwitterExport: EndNote, Zotero | BibTex
Usage statisticsLook up in GoogleScholar | Find in a UK Library