Feeney, A. (2007) 'How many processes underlie category-based induction ? effects of conclusion specificity and cognitive ability.', Memory & cognition., 35 (7). pp. 1830-1839.
Two studies investigated participants' sensitivity to the amount and diversity of the evidence when reasoning inductively about categories. Both showed that participants are more sensitive to characteristics of the evidence for arguments with general rather than specific conclusions. Both showed an association between cognitive ability and sensitivity to these evidence characteristics, particularly when the conclusion category was general. These results suggest that a simple associative process may not be sufficient to capture some key phenomena of category-based induction. They also support the claim that the need to generate a superordinate category is a complicating factor in category-based reasoning and that adults' tendency to generate such categories while reasoning has been overestimated.
|Full text:||PDF - Published Version (98Kb)|
|Publisher Web site:||http://mc.psychonomic-journals.org/content/35/7/1830.abstract|
|Publisher statement:||© Copyright 2007 Psychonomic Society, Inc.|
|Record Created:||11 Feb 2009|
|Last Modified:||04 Nov 2010 10:29|
|Social bookmarking:||Export: EndNote, Zotero | BibTex|
|Usage statistics||Look up in GoogleScholar | Find in a UK Library|