We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

Durham Research Online
You are in:

The truth behind practices : Wittgenstein, Robinson Crusoe and ecclesiology.

Insole, C. J. (2007) 'The truth behind practices : Wittgenstein, Robinson Crusoe and ecclesiology.', Studies in Christian ethics., 20 (3). pp. 364-382.


The Wittgensteinian claim that meaning is immanent to 'practices', influential in contemporary theology, is capable of two readings: the first takes `practice' to refer to the social activities of actual communities; the second implies no more than a way of going on that is in principle communicable. The first reading is palpably unattractive, both philosophically and exegetically; the second reading is much less ambitious, providing a plausible critique of empiricist theories of meaning. I suggest that it is the first implausible reading that is often at work in theological appropriations of Wittgenstein, such as we find in Stanley Hauerwas. I fill-out this claim by exploring — with an ear to Scripture — the implications for ecclesiology of adopting either of the two readings. I conclude by raising the alarm about two dangers: of being too Wittgensteinian in some respects, and not Wittgensteinian enough in others.

Item Type:Article
Keywords:Church, Community, Ecclesiology, Hauerwas, Practices, Truth, Theology, Wittgenstein.
Full text:Full text not available from this repository.
Publisher Web site:
Record Created:27 Jan 2009
Last Modified:20 Aug 2010 11:21

Social bookmarking: del.icio.usConnoteaBibSonomyCiteULikeFacebookTwitterExport: EndNote, Zotero | BibTex
Look up in GoogleScholar | Find in a UK Library