Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

The worlds of welfare : illusory and gender-blind ?

Bambra, C. (2004) 'The worlds of welfare : illusory and gender-blind ?', Social policy and society., 3 (3). pp. 201-212.

Abstract

The nature of welfare state regimes has been an ongoing debate within the comparative social policy literature since the publication of Esping-Andersen's The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism (1990). This paper engages with two aspects of this debate; the gender critique of Esping-Andersen's thesis, and Kasza's (2002) assertions about the ‘illusory nature’ of welfare state regimes. It presents a gender-focused defamilisation index and contrasts it with Esping-Andersen's decommodification index to illustrate that, whilst individual welfare states have been shown to exhibit internal variety across different policy areas, they are both consistent and coherent in terms of their policy variation by gender. It concludes, in contrast to both the gender critique of Esping-Andersen, and Kasza's rejection of the regimes concept, that the ‘worlds of welfare’ approach is therefore neither gender blind or illusory, and can, if limited to the analysis of specific areas such as labour market decommodification or defamilisation, be resurrected as a useful means of organising and classifying welfare states.

Item Type:Article
Full text:PDF - Published Version (88Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S147474640400171X
Publisher statement:Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004. This paper has been published by Cambridge University Press in Social policy and society (3:3 (2004) 201-212) http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=228839
Record Created:07 Nov 2008
Last Modified:26 Oct 2011 09:42

Social bookmarking: del.icio.usConnoteaBibSonomyCiteULikeFacebookTwitterExport: EndNote, Zotero | BibTex
Usage statisticsLook up in GoogleScholar | Find in a UK Library