K.J. Doick
Understanding success in the context of brownfield greening projects: The requirement for outcome evaluation in urban greenspace success assessment
Doick, K.J.; Sellers, G.; Castan Broto, v; Silverthorne, T.
Authors
G. Sellers
v Castan Broto
T. Silverthorne
Abstract
Many European governments place strong emphasis on integrated land use policies, particularly the re-establishment of public open access greenspaces through brownfield land regeneration. The UK Government considers the regeneration of brownfield land a prime tool for the delivery of regional economic regeneration, neighbourhood renewal and international biodiversity commitments. A number of failed brownfield greening projects question both the sustainability of such undertakings and whether greenspaces are fulfilling the functions they were designed for. Reliance on developer-, funding body- and site owner-centric notions of success in project delivery evaluation, to the exclusion of social and environmental impacts, has failed to highlight revenue requirements for management and maintenance to maintain function and quality. Brownfield greening project aims and objectives can be characterised as inputs, processes, outputs and outcomes using the general organisational ‘logic’ framework model. Applying this framework to six UK case studies, this research demonstrated that most greenspace aims and objectives are in fact ‘outcomes’ delivered in the medium and long terms following regeneration. The model is supportive of integrated, stakeholder inclusive monitoring over short, medium and long time periods. Physicochemical and social data from the case study sites were employed to present a comprehensive evaluation of site success. In each case, a lack of monitoring and evaluation – combined with insufficient supporting revenue funds – failed to highlight site issues, changes in local emphasis and ultimately a lack of success with respect to project aims and site sustainability. This research supports claims that capital funds to regenerate land must be supported by a revenue package for management and maintenance, that monitoring must be a funded activity; and, that monitoring and evaluation in support of the management cycle will promote the long-term sustainability, value and use of a greenspace.
Citation
Doick, K., Sellers, G., Castan Broto, V., & Silverthorne, T. (2009). Understanding success in the context of brownfield greening projects: The requirement for outcome evaluation in urban greenspace success assessment. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 8(3), 163-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2009.05.002
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Publication Date | Aug 1, 2009 |
Deposit Date | Oct 1, 2009 |
Publicly Available Date | Nov 27, 2009 |
Journal | Urban Forestry and Urban Greening |
Print ISSN | 1618-8667 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 8 |
Issue | 3 |
Pages | 163-178 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2009.05.002 |
Keywords | Greenspace establishment, Logic model, Monitoring, Sustainability. |
Files
Accepted Journal Article
(505 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
The Governance of coal ash pollution in post-socialist times: power and expectations
(2009)
Journal Article
Coal ash and risk: Four social interpretations of a pollution landscape
(2007)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search