Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

Can things endure in tenseless time ?

Ingthorsson, R. D. (2009) 'Can things endure in tenseless time ?', Sats–Nordic journal of philosophy., 10 (1). pp. 79-99.

Abstract

It has been argued that the tenseless view of time is incompatible with endurantism. This has been disputed, perhaps most famously by Hugh Mellor and Peter Simons. They argue that things can endure in tenseless time, and indeed must endure if tenseless time is to contain change. In this paper I will point out some difficulties with Mellor’s and Simons’ claims that in tenseless time a particular can be ‘wholly present’ at various times, and therefore endure, as well as have incompatible properties at those different times, and thereby change. In effect I argue that they do not resolve the charge that the tenseless view of time is incomatible with endurantism because the tenseless view does not allow anything to change temporal location and thereby come to be ‘wholly present’ at various times.

Item Type:Article
Keywords:Mellor, Simons, Tenseless Time, Temporal Parity, Persistence.
Full text:PDF - Accepted Version (353Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:http://cjas.dk/index.php/sats/article/view/2549
Record Created:07 Oct 2009 11:20
Last Modified:25 Nov 2011 09:42

Social bookmarking: del.icio.usConnoteaBibSonomyCiteULikeFacebookTwitterExport: EndNote, Zotero | BibTex
Usage statisticsLook up in GoogleScholar | Find in a UK Library