Berenbrink, P. and Friedetzky, T. and Goldberg, L. A. (2003) 'The natural work-stealing algorithm is stable.', SIAM journal on computing., 32 (5). pp. 1260-1279.
In this paper we analyze a very simple dynamic work-stealing algorithm. In the work-generation model, there are n (work) generators. A generator-allocation function is simply a function from the n generators to the n processors. We consider a fixed, but arbitrary, distribution $\cal D$ over generator-allocation functions. During each time step of our process, a generator-allocation function h is chosen from $\cal D$, and the generators are allocated to the processors according to h. Each generator may then generate a unit-time task, which it inserts into the queue of its host processor. It generates such a task independently with probability $\lambda$. After the new tasks are generated, each processor removes one task from its queue and services it. For many choices of $\cal D$, the work-generation model allows the load to become arbitrarily imbalanced, even when $\lambda < 1$. For example, $\cal D$ could be the point distribution containing a single function h which allocates all of the generators to just one processor. For this choice of $\cal D$, the chosen processor receives around $\lambda n$ units of work at each step and services one. The natural work-stealing algorithm that we analyze is widely used in practical applications and works as follows. During each time step, each empty processor (with no work to do) sends a request to a randomly selected other processor. Any nonempty processor having received at least one such request in turn decides (again randomly) in favor of one of the requests. The number of tasks which are transferred from the nonempty processor to the empty one is determined by the so-called work-stealing functionf. In particular, if a processor that accepts a request has $\ell$ tasks stored in its queue, then $f(\ell)$ tasks are transferred to the currently empty one. A popular work-stealing function is $f(\ell)=\lfloor \ell/2\rfloor$, which transfers (roughly) half of the tasks. We analyze the long-term behavior of the system as a function of $\lambda$ and f. We show that the system is stable for any constant generation rate $\lambda < 1$ and for a wide class of functions f. Most intuitively sensible functions are included in this class (for example, every monotonically nondecreasing function f which satisfies $0 \leq f(\ell)\leq \ell/2$ and $f(\ell)=\omega(1)$ as a function of $\ell$ is included). Furthermore, we give upper bounds on theaverage system load (as a function of f and n). Our proof techniques combine Lyapunov function arguments with domination arguments, which are needed to cope with dependency.
|Keywords:||Work-stealing, Dynamic, Stability.|
|Full text:||PDF - Published Version (217Kb)|
|Publisher Web site:||http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/S0097539701399551|
|Publisher statement:||© 2003 Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics|
|Record Created:||07 Oct 2008|
|Last Modified:||15 Jun 2011 16:54|
|Social bookmarking:||Export: EndNote, Zotero | BibTex|
|Usage statistics||Look up in GoogleScholar | Find in a UK Library|