Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

From Gaussian to Paretian thinking : causes and implications of power laws in organizations.

Andriani, P. and McKelvey, B. (2009) 'From Gaussian to Paretian thinking : causes and implications of power laws in organizations.', Organization science., 20 (6). pp. 1053-1071.

Abstract

Although normal distributions and related current quantitative methods are still relevant for some organizational research, the growing ubiquity of power laws signifies that Pareto rank/frequency distributions, fractals, and underlying scale-free theories are increasingly pervasive and valid characterizations of organizational dynamics. When they apply, researchers ignoring power-law effects risk drawing false conclusions and promulgating useless advice to practitioners. This is because what is important to most managers are the extremes they face, not the averages. We show that power laws are pervasive in the organizational world and present 15 scale-free theories that apply to organizations. Next we discuss research implications embedded in Pareto rank/frequency distributions and draw statistical and methodological implications.

Item Type:Article
Keywords:Pareto, Power law, Gaussian statistics, Organization, Average, Extreme events, Scale-free theory.
Full text:Full text not available from this repository.
Publisher Web site:http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0481
Record Created:24 Mar 2010 14:35
Last Modified:08 Apr 2010 11:51

Social bookmarking: del.icio.usConnoteaBibSonomyCiteULikeFacebookTwitterExport: EndNote, Zotero | BibTex
Usage statisticsLook up in GoogleScholar | Find in a UK Library