Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. You can change your cookie settings at any time. Otherwise, we'll assume you're OK to continue.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

Wicked comparisons : reflections on cross-national research about health inequalities in the UK.

Blackman, T. and Harrington, B. and Hunter, D. and Marks, L. and McKee, L. and Greene, A. and Elliott, E. and Williams, G. (2010) 'Wicked comparisons : reflections on cross-national research about health inequalities in the UK.', Evaluation., 16 (1). pp. 43-57.

Abstract

This article discusses a comparative study of how local actors tackle health inequalities in England, Scotland and Wales. The main method used in this study was a thematic analysis of 200 interview transcripts. Its focus was on how health inequalities are framed for intervention by performance assessment systems and the challenge for these systems that their nature as a ‘wicked issue’ presents. The three different national contexts are described, including organizational structures and the use of targets, and the difficulty of making evaluative comparisons is considered. Reflecting on results from the study, it is concluded that both divergence and convergence in themes across the three countries reveal narrative patterns that draw on discourses rather than evidence. The nature of national performance audit regimes appears to play an important part in shaping these discourses, which are themselves evolving, partly in interaction with local feedback.

Item Type:Article
Keywords:Discourses, Health inequalities, National comparisons, Performance assessment, UK.
Full text:Full text not available from this repository.
Publisher Web site:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1356389009350016
Record Created:25 Mar 2010 10:50
Last Modified:27 Oct 2011 11:21

Social bookmarking: del.icio.usConnoteaBibSonomyCiteULikeFacebookTwitterExport: EndNote, Zotero | BibTex
Usage statisticsLook up in GoogleScholar | Find in a UK Library