Williams, D.M. and Lind, S.E. and Happé, F. (2009) 'Metacognition may be more impaired than mindreading in autism.', Behavioral and brain sciences., 32 (2). pp. 162-163.
This commentary focuses on evidence from autism concerning the relation between metacognition and mindreading. We support Carruthers' rejection of models 1 (independent systems) and 3 (metacognition before mindreading), and provide evidence to strengthen his critique. However, we also present evidence from autism that we believe supports model 2 (one mechanism, two modes of access) over model 4 (mindreading is prior).
|Full text:||Full text not available from this repository.|
|Publisher Web site:||http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X09000818|
|Record Created:||12 Oct 2010 11:05|
|Last Modified:||09 Oct 2014 14:12|
|Social bookmarking:||Export: EndNote, Zotero | BibTex|
|Usage statistics||Look up in GoogleScholar | Find in a UK Library|