Sear, R. and Lawson, D.W. and Dickins, T.E. (2007) 'Synthesis in the human evolutionary behavioural sciences.', Journal of evolutionary psychology., 5 (1-4). pp. 3-28.
Over the last three decades, the application of evolutionary theory to the human sciences has shown remarkable growth. This growth has also been characterised by a ‘splitting’ process, with the emergence of distinct sub-disciplines, most notably: Human Behavioural Ecology (HBE), Evolutionary Psychology (EP) and studies of Cultural Evolution (CE). Multiple applications of evolutionary ideas to the human sciences are undoubtedly a good thing, demonstrating the usefulness of this approach to human affairs. Nevertheless, this fracture has been associated with considerable tension, a lack of integration, and sometimes outright conflict between researchers. In recent years however, there have been clear signs of hope that a synthesis of the human evolutionary behavioural sciences is underway. Here, we briefly review the history of the debate, both its theoretical and practical causes; then provide evidence that the field is currently becoming more integrated, as the traditional boundaries between sub-disciplines become blurred. This article constitutes the first paper under the new editorship of the Journal of Evolutionary Psychology , which aims to further this integration by explicitly providing a forum for integrated work.
|Keywords:||Human Behavioural Ecology, Evolutionary Psychology, Cultural Evolution.|
|Full text:||PDF - Accepted Version (388Kb)|
|Publisher Web site:||http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/JEP.2007.1019|
|Publisher statement:||The file deposited in DRO is not the final published version of the paper. This is available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/JEP.2007.1019|
|Record Created:||06 Dec 2010 16:50|
|Last Modified:||03 Mar 2011 10:04|
|Social bookmarking:||Export: EndNote, Zotero | BibTex|
|Usage statistics||Look up in GoogleScholar | Find in a UK Library|