We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

Durham Research Online
You are in:

Modalities in sociological arguments.

Polos, L. and Hannan, M.T. and Hsu, G. (2010) 'Modalities in sociological arguments.', Journal of mathematical sociology., 34 (3). pp. 201-238.


This article introduces modal logics for a sociological audience. We first provide an overview of the formal properties of this family of models and outline key differences with classical first-order logic. We then build a model to represent processes of perception and belief core to social theories. To do this, we define our multimodal language and then add substantive constraints that specify the inferential behavior of modalities for perception, default, and belief. We illustrate the deployment of this language to the theory of legitimation proposed by Hannan, Plos, and Carroll (2007). This article aims to call attention to the potential benefits of modal logics for theory building in sociology.

Item Type:Article
Keywords:Logic, Methodology, Organizations.
Full text:Full text not available from this repository.
Publisher Web site:
Record Created:18 Feb 2011 15:35
Last Modified:05 Dec 2012 12:17

Social bookmarking: del.icio.usConnoteaBibSonomyCiteULikeFacebookTwitterExport: EndNote, Zotero | BibTex
Look up in GoogleScholar | Find in a UK Library