Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

NICE guidance on long-term sickness and incapacity

Gabbay, M.; Taylor, L.; Sheppard, L.; Hillage, J.; Bambra, C.; Ford, F.; Preece, R.; Taske, N.; Kelly, M.P.

NICE guidance on long-term sickness and incapacity Thumbnail


Authors

M. Gabbay

L. Taylor

L. Sheppard

J. Hillage

C. Bambra

F. Ford

R. Preece

N. Taske

M.P. Kelly



Abstract

Long-term sickness absence and incapacity benefits (disability pension) rates have increased across industrialised countries. Effective measures are needed to support return to work. The recommendations of this guidance were informed by the most appropriate available evidence of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. Public health evidence was provided by research using a variety of study designs that attempted to determine the outcome of a particular intervention by evaluating status before and after the intervention had been effected, and was not limited to randomised control trials. Where the evidence base was depleted or underdeveloped, expert witnesses were called to give their opinion on the best available evidence and emerging interventions. The process enabled challenge and contestability from stakeholder groups at different points as the guidance was developed. Forty-five heterogeneous studies were included in the review of interventions to reduce long-term sickness absence and transitions from short-term to long-term absence (mainly covering the former and also mainly examining musculoskeletal conditions). The analysis of evidence was restricted to descriptive synthesis. Three general themes emerged from an analysis of the studies that were more likely to report positive results: early interventions; multidisciplinary approaches; and interventions with a workplace component. Two further reviews were undertaken, one on interventions to reduce the re-occurrence of sickness absence, which identified seven studies on lower back pain, and concluded that early intervention and direct workplace input are important factors. The final evidence review focused on six studies of interventions for those in receipt of incapacity benefit. The evidence was that work-focused interviews coupled with access to tailored support are effective and cost-effective interventions. Practitioners should consider the impact of interventions and management options on work ability for patients of working age. Work ability should be considered a key outcome for future intervention studies.

Citation

Gabbay, M., Taylor, L., Sheppard, L., Hillage, J., Bambra, C., Ford, F., …Kelly, M. (2011). NICE guidance on long-term sickness and incapacity. British Journal of General Practice, 61(584), e118-124. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp11x561221

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Oct 29, 2010
Online Publication Date Mar 1, 2011
Publication Date Mar 1, 2011
Deposit Date Feb 23, 2011
Publicly Available Date Dec 13, 2017
Journal British Journal of General Practice
Print ISSN 0960-1643
Electronic ISSN 1478-5242
Publisher Royal College of General Practitioners
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 61
Issue 584
Pages e118-124
DOI https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp11x561221
Keywords Evidence-based medicine, Guideline, Sick leave, Sick leave cost, Work capacity evaluation.

Files




You might also like



Downloadable Citations