We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

Durham Research Online
You are in:

Re-possessing 'home' : a re-analysis of gender, home ownership and debtor default for feminist legal theory.

Fox, Lorna (2008) 'Re-possessing 'home' : a re-analysis of gender, home ownership and debtor default for feminist legal theory.', William & Mary journal of women and the law., 14 (3). p. 2.


The recent crisis in sub-prime mortgage lending in the US has highlighted the risks associated with borrowing money against the security of one’s home. From a macro-economic perspective, rising levels of default, foreclosure and bankruptcy have significant adverse implications for the housing market and the wider economy, both in the US, and as a ripple effect around the world. Debtor default also has major implications for the individuals whose homes are at risk of repossession at the hands of a creditor. This article considers this risk, as well as the reality of losing one’s home, from a gendered perspective. Drawing on empirical evidence relating to the meanings and values of the home for occupiers, including specific analysis of the relationships between women occupiers and their homes, it argues against the traditional rejection of ‘home’ as a positive phenomenon in feminist theory. Building on evidence concerning the experiences of women as home buyers, home occupiers and defaulting debtors, the article calls for a re-conceptualisation of ‘home’ in feminist legal theory.

Item Type:Article
Keywords:Mortgage and repossession, Gender, Feminist, Theory, Home.
Full text:PDF - Published Version (4743Kb)
Publisher Web site:
Record Created:13 Jul 2011 16:50
Last Modified:15 Jul 2011 16:26

Social bookmarking: del.icio.usConnoteaBibSonomyCiteULikeFacebookTwitterExport: EndNote, Zotero | BibTex
Usage statisticsLook up in GoogleScholar | Find in a UK Library