Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. You can change your cookie settings at any time. Otherwise, we'll assume you're OK to continue.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

Detailing judicial difference.

Rackley, Erika (2009) 'Detailing judicial difference.', Feminist legal studies., 17 (1). pp. 11-26.

Abstract

In January 2004 Baroness Brenda Hale became the first woman to sit on the Appellate Committee of the House of Lords. Five years on, she has brought to her judicial role a lightness of touch that belies her increasingly significant impact on the court’s jurisprudence. Early forecasts that she would be “just a bit different” from her male companions have proved prophetic. However such assessments have stemmed primarily from a focus on her decision-making on a case-by-case basis. But what of her jurisprudence as a whole? This paper considers arguments for a more sustained and coherent methodological approach to analyses of Baroness Hale’s (and other judges’) jurisprudence as a framework through which to better understand and explore the potential of judicial difference and to better inform current debates about increasing judicial diversity in England and Wales.

Item Type:Article
Keywords:Baroness Hale, Difference, Diversity, Judging.
Full text:Full text not available from this repository.
Publisher Web site:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10691-009-9107-8
Record Created:14 Jul 2011 10:05
Last Modified:22 Jun 2012 16:31

Social bookmarking: del.icio.usConnoteaBibSonomyCiteULikeFacebookTwitterExport: EndNote, Zotero | BibTex
Usage statisticsLook up in GoogleScholar | Find in a UK Library