Siems, Mathias (2008) 'Legal originality.', Oxford journal of legal studies., 28 (1). pp. 147-164.
In legal academia it is highly controversial how to ‘be original’ in legal research. This article will try to maintain an attitude of tolerance in not promoting or discrediting one particular methodology. Instead, it will identify four different ways of ‘being original’. Perhaps the most common approach is to deal with ‘micro-legal questions’. Many legal academics also pursue research in ‘macro-legal questions’. Less common but growing is the importance of ‘scientific legal research’ and research in ‘non-legal topics’.
|Full text:||PDF - Accepted Version (352Kb)|
|Publisher Web site:||http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqm024|
|Publisher statement:||This is a pre-copy-editing author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Oxford journal of legal studies following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version Siems, Mathias (2008) 'Legal originality.', Oxford journal of legal studies., 28 (1). pp. 147-164 is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqm024|
|Record Created:||12 Aug 2011 15:50|
|Last Modified:||23 Aug 2011 15:57|
|Social bookmarking:||Export: EndNote, Zotero | BibTex|
|Usage statistics||Look up in GoogleScholar | Find in a UK Library|