Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over frontal eye fields disrupts visually cued auditory attention.

Smith, D.T. and Jackson, S.R. and Rorden, C. (2009) 'Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over frontal eye fields disrupts visually cued auditory attention.', Brain stimulation., 2 (2). pp. 81-87.

Abstract

Voluntary eye movements and covert shifts of visual attention activate the same brain regions. Specifically, the intra parietal sulcus and the frontal eye fields (FEF) appear to be involved both with generating voluntary saccades as well with attending to a peripheral spatial location. Furthermore, these regions appear to be required by both tasks – functional disruption of these regions impairs both tasks. Therefore, it appears that the targeting system that allows us to plan saccades is the same system that allows us to covertly track peripheral visual information. Recent neuroimaging studies suggest that these brain regions are also activated when participants engage in auditory spatial attention tasks. However, it remains unclear whether these regions are required by these tasks. We used repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) to disrupt the FEF while participants performed an auditory localisation task. On each trial, a visual cue directed attention to the probable laterality of the auditory target, and the participant decided whether the subsequent target sound came from an upper or lower speaker. In the absence of TMS, individuals were faster to respond to targets that occurred on the cued side (valid trials) than when the target appears contralaterally to the cued side (invalid side). TMS interfered with this effect, such that the costs associated with ipsilateral invalidly cued targets were substantially reduced. These results suggest that the eye-movement system is needed for normal auditory attention.

Item Type:Article
Keywords:Frontal eye fields, Endogenous attention, Reaction times, Humans, Audition.
Full text:Full text not available from this repository.
Publisher Web site:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2008.07.005
Record Created:17 Oct 2011 15:35
Last Modified:18 Oct 2011 16:51

Social bookmarking: del.icio.usConnoteaBibSonomyCiteULikeFacebookTwitterExport: EndNote, Zotero | BibTex
Usage statisticsLook up in GoogleScholar | Find in a UK Library