Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. You can change your cookie settings at any time. Otherwise, we'll assume you're OK to continue.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

Young men, sexual health and responsibility for contraception : a qualitative pilot study.

Brown, S. (2012) 'Young men, sexual health and responsibility for contraception : a qualitative pilot study.', Journal of family planning and reproductive health care., 38 (1). 44-47 .

Abstract

Background and methodology: Despite increasing interest over the last decade or more in men's views of sexual health services and use of contraception, most published literature focuses on women. It is important that the views of boys and young men are better understood, particularly with regard to responsibility for use of contraception. This pilot study aimed to gain insights into young men's views of sexual health services and contraception; five non-fathers aged between 14 and 18 years took part in two focus groups. The groups were recorded, transcribed and analysed using the constant comparative method to build up categories of data. Results: Engaging young men in research is very difficult, particularly young men who are not in education or employment. Young fathers proved impossible to recruit. The young men who took part in the study thought responsibility for contraception was shared, although this was partly dependent on relationship status, namely whether sex was with a regular partner or a one-night stand. Discussion and conclusions: These findings are based on a small sample and all participants were in full-time education. It is likely that attitudes may differ from those who are not in education, training or employment. In a future study, it would be important to ensure that young men from different class and educational backgrounds are included in the research, as the tentative conclusions from this pilot study suggest that educational status is a factor in beliefs about responsibility.

Item Type:Article
Full text:PDF - Accepted Version (396Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jfprhc-2011-100119
Record Created:08 Nov 2011 12:50
Last Modified:23 Aug 2012 14:47

Social bookmarking: del.icio.usConnoteaBibSonomyCiteULikeFacebookTwitterExport: EndNote, Zotero | BibTex
Usage statisticsLook up in GoogleScholar | Find in a UK Library