Fenwick, Helen (2008) 'Proactive counter-terrorist strategies in conflict with human rights.', International review of law, computers and technology., 22 (3). pp. 259-270.
Abstract
Three standard governmental policy responses to terrorism have been identified: a military one, treating the fight against terrorism as a form of warfare; a police-based one, treating it simply as a form of criminal activity, to be detected and then defeated using (perhaps some modified version of) the criminal justice system; and a political one, viewing it as a form of armed rebellion to be resolved through negotiation and the political process. All three responses to terrorism may be evident in any particular instance.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Keywords: | Counter-terrorism, Human rights, Control orders. |
| Full text: | Full text not available from this repository. |
| Publisher Web site: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13600860802496467 |
| Record Created: | 17 Jan 2012 10:35 |
| Last Modified: | 08 Mar 2012 11:09 |
Social bookmarking: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Export: EndNote, Zotero | BibTex |
| Usage statistics | Look up in GoogleScholar | Find in a UK Library |





![[Feed]](/images/RSSwebsmall.jpg)
![[Tweets]](/images/Twitterwebsmall.png)