Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. You can change your cookie settings at any time. Otherwise, we'll assume you're OK to continue.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

It depends how you look at it : on the relationship between neuroticism and conscientiousness at the within- and the between-person levels of analysis.

Beckmann, N. and Wood, R.E. and Minbashian, A (2010) 'It depends how you look at it : on the relationship between neuroticism and conscientiousness at the within- and the between-person levels of analysis.', Journal of research in personality., 44 (5). pp. 593-601.

Abstract

Research on personality structure has primarily focused on patterns of covariation between traits, and less emphasis has been put on the organization of relationships between thoughts, feelings and behaviors as they occur within individuals. Over several weeks 115 managers from large Australian companies were assessed multiple times a day employing experience-sampling methodology. Within- and between-person variation in personality responses was analyzed using hierarchical linear modeling and correlation analyses. Findings indicate that analyzing personality as a within-person phenomenon reveals information not well captured by the trait approach. While conscientiousness and neuroticism were negatively correlated at the between-person level, this relationship was reversed at the within-person level. Results are discussed in terms of the distinctness of the within- and between-person structure of personality.

Item Type:Article
Keywords:Within-person variability, Conscientiousness, Neuroticism, Personality structure, Experience sampling, Organizational behavior.
Full text:PDF - Accepted Version (542Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2010.07.004
Publisher statement:NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of research in personality. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of research in personality, 44, 5, 2010, 10.1016/j.jrp.2010.07.004
Record Created:03 Feb 2012 15:05
Last Modified:29 Aug 2012 12:17

Social bookmarking: del.icio.usConnoteaBibSonomyCiteULikeFacebookTwitterExport: EndNote, Zotero | BibTex
Usage statisticsLook up in GoogleScholar | Find in a UK Library