We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

Durham Research Online
You are in:

Case C-442/02, Caixa-Bank France v. Ministère de l’Économie, des Finances et de l’Industrie.

Spaventa, E. (2005) 'Case C-442/02, Caixa-Bank France v. Ministère de l’Économie, des Finances et de l’Industrie.', Common market law review., 42 (4). pp. 1151-1168.


Confirming a trend started with the Gebhard judgment, and consistently with its case law on free movement of capital, the Court in Caixa-Bank held that a non-discriminatory rule prohibiting remuneration on sight accounts is an unjustified barrier to the freedom of establishment. Even though the ruling is consistent with the previous broad interpretation given to the free movement provisions, the case is exemplary of the issues arising once a supranational court decides to substitute its own judgment for that of the competent regulator. Thus, in just twenty-four paragraphs and with no market analysis, the Court is satisfied that the rule is a barrier to market access, and that, even though the rule “is indeed suitable for encouraging medium and long-term saving”, it is not justified. No consideration is given to the fact that regulation in a field as complex as the banking sector, where the consumer might be particularly vulnerable, is informed by complex policy choices, and might pursue welfare as well as economic aims. Once more then the Court has decided to substitute its own judgment for that of the national regulator in relation to measures which did not discriminate against foreign undertakings; this time however it is not clear that the Court’s assessment strikes the correct balance between market deregulation and consumer protection.

Item Type:Article
Full text:(VoR) Version of Record
Download PDF
Publisher Web site:
Publisher statement:Reprinted from (Common market law review, 42 (4), 2005, pp. 1151-1168, with permission of Kluwer Law International.
Record Created:27 Mar 2012 15:20
Last Modified:02 Jun 2016 14:50

Social bookmarking: del.icio.usConnoteaBibSonomyCiteULikeFacebookTwitterExport: EndNote, Zotero | BibTex
Look up in GoogleScholar | Find in a UK Library