Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Case C-442/02, Caixa-Bank France v. Ministère de l’Économie, des Finances et de l’Industrie

Spaventa, E.

Case C-442/02, Caixa-Bank France v. Ministère de l’Économie, des Finances et de l’Industrie Thumbnail


Authors

E. Spaventa



Abstract

Confirming a trend started with the Gebhard judgment, and consistently with its case law on free movement of capital, the Court in Caixa-Bank held that a non-discriminatory rule prohibiting remuneration on sight accounts is an unjustified barrier to the freedom of establishment. Even though the ruling is consistent with the previous broad interpretation given to the free movement provisions, the case is exemplary of the issues arising once a supranational court decides to substitute its own judgment for that of the competent regulator. Thus, in just twenty-four paragraphs and with no market analysis, the Court is satisfied that the rule is a barrier to market access, and that, even though the rule “is indeed suitable for encouraging medium and long-term saving”, it is not justified. No consideration is given to the fact that regulation in a field as complex as the banking sector, where the consumer might be particularly vulnerable, is informed by complex policy choices, and might pursue welfare as well as economic aims. Once more then the Court has decided to substitute its own judgment for that of the national regulator in relation to measures which did not discriminate against foreign undertakings; this time however it is not clear that the Court’s assessment strikes the correct balance between market deregulation and consumer protection.

Citation

Spaventa, E. (2005). Case C-442/02, Caixa-Bank France v. Ministère de l’Économie, des Finances et de l’Industrie. Common Market Law Review, 42(4), 1151-1168

Journal Article Type Article
Publication Date Aug 1, 2005
Deposit Date Mar 27, 2012
Publicly Available Date Jun 2, 2016
Journal Common Market Law Review
Print ISSN 0165-0750
Publisher Kluwer Law International
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 42
Issue 4
Pages 1151-1168
Publisher URL http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/productinfo.php?pubcode=COLA

Files

Published Journal Article (90 Kb)
PDF

Copyright Statement
Reprinted from (Common market law review, 42 (4), 2005, pp. 1151-1168, with permission of Kluwer Law International.







You might also like



Downloadable Citations