Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

Photosynthesis and productivity in heterogeneous arctic tundra : consequences for ecosystem function of mixing vegetation types at stand edges.

Fletcher, B.J. and Gornall, J.L. and Poyatos, R. and Press, M.C. and Stoy, P.C. and Huntley, B. and Baxter, R. and Phoenix, G.K. (2012) 'Photosynthesis and productivity in heterogeneous arctic tundra : consequences for ecosystem function of mixing vegetation types at stand edges.', Journal of ecology., 100 (2). pp. 441-451.

Abstract

1. Arctic vegetation tends to be spatially heterogeneous and can have large areas of mixed transition zone vegetation between stands dominated by a single or few species. If plant photosynthesis and growth within these transition zones differs significantly from main vegetation stands, and if transition zones are not considered when extrapolating stand-level findings to larger scales in space, then transition zones will provide considerable error to landscape-level estimates of gross primary productivity (GPP). 2. In a heterogeneous sub-Arctic tundra landscape, we undertook a detailed assessment of plant and ecosystem photosynthesis and plant growth in stands dominated by the short-stature evergreen dwarf shrub Empetrum hermaphroditum, the deciduous dwarf shrub Betula nana, the taller deciduous shrub Salix glauca and also the transition zones between them. 3. Our findings show that plants in transition zones towards taller and more productive vegetation types frequently showed reduced shoot growth, equal or reduced light-saturated photosynthesis (P-max) and other typical shade responses (e. g. increased leaf chlorophyll and leaf area per mass) when compared with conspecific plants in main stands where the species is dominant. Critically, whole-ecosystem GPP per leaf area was 20-40% lower in transition zones than in main vegetation stands as a consequence. A modelling analysis suggests that the under-productivity of some transition zones results fromthe lack of a clear 'winner' in the competition for light, such that active leaves of some species are shaded by relatively inactive leaves of others. 4. These findings highlight how biotic interactions can considerably influence plant performance to the extent that productivity of mixed vegetation (transition zones) cannot be predicted from their main stands either side. How the consequences of mixing vegetation relate to mechanisms in biodiversity-function theory is discussed. 5. Synthesis: Our work shows that the productivity of transition zones of arctic vegetation is considerably lower than may be estimated fromthe main stands on either side. This reduced GPP in transition zones, therefore, must be considered when modelling carbon fluxes at the landscape scale and suggests that the impact of transition zones on ecosystem function needs further investigation in heterogeneous landscapes, where they make up a significant proportion of the land cover.

Item Type:Article
Keywords:Biodiversity, Carbon balance, Competition, Ecophysiology, Facilitation, GPP, Growth, Realised niche, Transition zones, Upscaling.
Full text:PDF - Accepted Version (773Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01913.x
Publisher statement:This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Fletcher, B. J., Gornall, J. L., Poyatos, R., Press, M. C., Stoy, P. C., Huntley, B., Baxter, R. and Phoenix, G. K. (2012), Photosynthesis and productivity in heterogeneous arctic tundra: consequences for ecosystem function of mixing vegetation types at stand edges. Journal of Ecology, 100 (2): 441–451, which has been published in final form at http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01913.x. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.
Record Created:11 May 2012 12:20
Last Modified:28 Aug 2014 13:32

Social bookmarking: del.icio.usConnoteaBibSonomyCiteULikeFacebookTwitterExport: EndNote, Zotero | BibTex
Usage statisticsLook up in GoogleScholar | Find in a UK Library