Durham Research Online
You are in:

Clinical evaluation of a simple uroflowmeter for categorization of maximum urinary flow rate.

Pridgeon, S. and Harding, C. and Newton, D. and Pickard, R. (2007) 'Clinical evaluation of a simple uroflowmeter for categorization of maximum urinary flow rate.', Indian journal of urology., 23 (2). pp. 114-118.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the accuracy and diagnostic usefulness of a disposable flowmeter consisting of a plastic funnel with a spout divided into three chambers. Materials and Methods: Men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) voided sequentially into a standard flowmeter and the funnel device recording maximum flow rate (Q max ) and voided volume (V void ). The device was precalibrated such that filling of the bottom, middle and top chambers categorized maximum input flows as <10, 10-15 and > 15 ml s -1 respectively. Subjects who agreed to use the funnel device at home obtained readings of flow category and V void twice daily for seven days. Results: A single office reading in 46 men using the device showed good agreement with standard measurement of Q max for V void > 150 ml (Kappa = 0.68). All 14 men whose void reached the top chamber had standard Q max > 15 ml s -1 (PPV = 100%, NPV = 72%) whilst eight of 12 men whose void remained in the bottom chamber had standard Q max < 10 ml s -1 (PPV = 70%, NPV = 94%). During multiple home use by 14 men the device showed moderate repeatability (Kappa = 0.58) and correctly categorized Q max in comparison to standard measurement for 12 (87%) men. Conclusions: This study suggests that the device has sufficient accuracy and reliability for initial flow rate assessment in men with LUTS. The device can provide a single measurement or alternatively multiple home measurements to categorize men with Q max < 15 ml s -1 .

Item Type:Article
Keywords:Bladder outlet obstruction, Urinary symptoms, Uroflowmetry.
Full text:Full text not available from this repository.
Publisher Web site:http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.32058
Record Created:01 Jun 2012 11:50
Last Modified:08 Jun 2012 10:26

Social bookmarking: del.icio.usConnoteaBibSonomyCiteULikeFacebookTwitterExport: EndNote, Zotero | BibTex
Usage statisticsLook up in GoogleScholar | Find in a UK Library