Stirk, Peter M.R. (2012) 'The Westphalian model and sovereign equality.', Review of international studies., 38 (3). pp. 641-660.
Although the Westphalian model takes many forms the association of Westphalian and sovereign equality is a prominent one. This article argues firstly that sovereign equality was not present as a normative principle at Westphalia. It argues further that while arguments for sovereign equality were present in the eighteenth century they did not rely on, or even suggest, a Westphalian provenance. It was, for good reasons, not until the late nineteenth century that the linkages of Westphalia and sovereign equality became commonplace, and even then sovereign equality and its linkage with Westphalia were disputed. It was not until after the Second World War, notably through the influential work of Leo Gross that the linkage of Westphalia and sovereign equality became not only widely accepted, but almost undisputed until quite recently. The article concludes by suggesting that not only did Gross bequeath a dubious historiography but that this historiography is an impediment to contemporary International Relations.
|Full text:||PDF - Accepted Version |
Publisher-imposed embargo until 01 July 2013. (113Kb)
|Publisher Web site:||http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0260210511000192|
|Publisher statement:||Copyright © British International Studies Association 2012. This paper has been published by Cambridge University Press in "Review of international studies" (38: 3 (2011) 641-660) http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=RIS|
|Record Created:||18 Jul 2012 17:05|
|Last Modified:||10 Apr 2013 09:49|
|Social bookmarking:||Export: EndNote, Zotero | BibTex|
|Usage statistics||Look up in GoogleScholar | Find in a UK Library|