We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

Durham Research Online
You are in:

Let a thousand Nomoi Bloom? Four problems with Robert Cover's 'Nomos and Narrative'.

Brooks, Thom (2006) 'Let a thousand Nomoi Bloom? Four problems with Robert Cover's 'Nomos and Narrative'.', Issues in legal scholarship., 6 (1).


Robert Cover's well known article Nomos and Narrative is a passionately argued defense of a new way of applying narrative to the philosophy and understanding of law. In my article, I argue that there are four major problems which lie at the heart of Cover's analysis. Each problem addresses a major area of his overall view of law. I try to demonstrate that in each case, if the problem is real, Cover's view of law should be rejected. The primary difficulty is analytical and argumentative sloppiness in Cover's arguments. My conclusion is simple: Cover's view of law is both underdeveloped and theoretically unsafe. It falls victim to each of the four problems I identify. As a result, his philosophy of law should be rejected tout court.

Item Type:Article
Full text:(VoR) Version of Record
Download PDF
Publisher Web site:
Date accepted:No date available
Date deposited:14 March 2013
Date of first online publication:2006
Date first made open access:No date available

Save or Share this output

Look up in GoogleScholar