Vickers, P. (2014) 'Scientific theory eliminativism.', Erkenntnis., 79 (1). pp. 111-126.
The philosopher of science faces overwhelming disagreement in the literature on the definition, nature, structure, ontology, and content of scientific theories. These disagreements are at least partly responsible for disagreements in many of the debates in the discipline which put weight on the concept *scientific theory*. I argue that available theories of theories and conceptual analyses of *theory* are ineffectual options for addressing this difficulty: they do not move debates forward in a significant way. Directing my attention to debates about the properties of particular, named theories, I introduce ‘theory eliminativism’ as a certain type of debate-reformulation. As a methodological tool it has the potential to be a highly effective way to make progress in the face of the noted problem: post-reformulation disagreements about *theory* cannot compromise the debate, and the questions that really matter can still be asked and answered. In addition the reformulation process demands that philosophers engage with science and the history of science in a more serious way than is usual in order to answer important questions about the justification for targeting a particular set of propositions (say) in a given context. All things considered, we should expect the benefits of a theory-eliminating debate-reformulation to heavily outweigh the costs for a highly significant number of debates of the relevant type.
|Full text:||(AM) Accepted Manuscript|
Download PDF (317Kb)
|Publisher Web site:||http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10670-013-9471-2|
|Publisher statement:||The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10670-013-9471-2.|
|Date accepted:||02 March 2013|
|Date deposited:||14 March 2014|
|Date of first online publication:||11 March 2013|
|Date first made open access:||No date available|
Save or Share this output
|Look up in GoogleScholar|