We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

Durham Research Online
You are in:

Should we nudge informed consent ?

Brooks, Thom (2013) 'Should we nudge informed consent ?', American journal of bioethics., 13 (6). pp. 22-23.


Critics argue that nudge theory manipulates rather than respects the informed consent of patients. Cohen (2013) convincingly argues that this criticism falls short of the mark. But we might go one step further: nudges are not only defensible, there are also inescapable. Cohen’s defence should be more robust and recognize the importance of context and unavoidable framing effects. The question is not whether nudges are acceptable, but rather how they might be better employed to improve informed consent and public policy. This Open Peer Commentary will explain the inevitability of nudging. A respect for informed consent is to respect choices within context. We can improve our efforts to support and improve informed consent, but we cannot act independently of contextual factors. So long as we must choose within context, we are subjected to nudges. We should not ask whether or not to nudge, but how best to nudge instead.

Item Type:Article
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Download PDF
Publisher Web site:
Publisher statement:This is an electronic version of an article published in Brooks, Thom (2013) 'Should we nudge informed consent ?', American journal of bioethics., 13 (6). pp. 22-23. American journal of bioethics is available online at:
Date accepted:No date available
Date deposited:12 April 2013
Date of first online publication:2013
Date first made open access:No date available

Save or Share this output

Look up in GoogleScholar