Brooks, Thom (2007) 'No rubber stamp : Hegel's constitutional monarch.', History of political thought., 28 (1). pp. 91-119.
Perhaps one of the most controversial aspects of Hegel's Philosophy of Right for contemporary interpreters is its discussion of the constitutional monarch. This is true despite the general agreement amongst virtually all interpreters that Hegel's monarch is no more powerful than modern constitutional monarchs and is an institution worthy of little attention or concern. In this article, I will examine whether or not it matters who is the monarch and what domestic and foreign powers he has. I argue against the virtual consensus of recent interpreters that Hegel's monarch is far more powerful than has been understood previously. In part, Hegel's monarch is perhaps even more powerful than Hegel himself may have realized and I will demonstrate certain inconsistencies with some of his claims. My reading represents a distinctive break from the virtual consensus, without endorsing the view that Hegel was a totalitarian.
|Full text:||(VoR) Version of Record|
Download PDF (821Kb)
|Publisher Web site:||http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/imp/hpt/2007/00000028/00000001/art00004|
|Publisher statement:||Copyright © Imprint Academic 2007|
|Date accepted:||No date available|
|Date deposited:||01 May 2013|
|Date of first online publication:||2007|
|Date first made open access:||No date available|
Save or Share this output
|Look up in GoogleScholar|