We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

Durham Research Online
You are in:

Dynamics of the North American Ice Sheet complex during its inception and build-up to the Last Glacial Maximum.

Stokes, C.R. and Tarasov, L. and Dyke, A.S. (2012) 'Dynamics of the North American Ice Sheet complex during its inception and build-up to the Last Glacial Maximum.', Quaternary science reviews., 50 . pp. 86-104.


The North American Ice Sheet Complex played a major role in global sea level fluctuations during the Late Quaternary but our knowledge of its dynamics is based mostly on its demise from the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM), a period characterised by non-linear behaviour in the form of punctuated ice margin recession, episodic ice streaming and major shifts in the location of ice divides. In comparison, knowledge of the pre-LGM ice complex is poorly constrained, largely because of the fragmentary nature of the evidence relating to ice sheet build-up. In this paper, we explore the inception and growth of ice (120–20 ka) using a glacial systems model which has been calibrated against a large and diverse set of data relating to the deglacial interval. We make use of calibration data prior to the LGM but its scarcity introduces greater uncertainty, which is partly alleviated by our large ensemble analysis. Results suggest that, following the last interglaciation (Oxygen Isotope Stage: OIS 5e), the ice complex initiated over the north-eastern Canadian Arctic and in the Cordillera within a few thousand years. It then underwent rapid growth to an OIS 5 maximum at ∼110 ka (5d) and covered ∼70% of the area occupied by the LGM ice cover (although only 30% by volume). An OIS 5 minimum is modelled at ∼80 ka (5a), before a second phase of rapid growth at the start of OIS 4, which culminated in a large ice complex at ∼65 ka (almost as large as at the LGM). Subsequent deglaciation was rapid (maximum modelled sea level contribution of >16 cm per century) and resulted in an OIS 3 minimum between ca 55–60 ka. Thereafter, the ice complex grew towards its LGM configuration, interrupted by several phases of successively less significant mass loss. Our results support and extend previous inferences based on geological evidence and reinforce the notion of a highly dynamic pre-LGM ice complex (e.g. with episodes of ±10 s m of eustatic sea level equivalent in <5 ka). Consistent with previous modelling, the fraction of warm-based ice increases towards the LGM from <20 to >50%, but even the thin OIS 5 ice sheets exhibit fast flow features (several 1000 m a−1) in major topographic troughs. Notwithstanding the severe limitations imposed by the use of the ‘shallow-ice approximation’, we note that most fast flow-features generated prior to the LGM correspond to the location of ‘known’ ice streams during deglaciation, i.e. in major topographic troughs and over soft sediments at the southern and western margins. Moreover, the modelled flux of these ‘ice streams’ (sensu lato), appears to be non-linearly scaled to ice sheet volume, i.e. there is no evidence that decay phases were associated with significantly increased ice stream activity. This hypothesis requires testing using a model with higher-order physics and future modelling would also benefit from additional pre-LGM constraints (e.g. dated ice free/margin positions) to help reduce and quantify uncertainties.

Item Type:Article
Keywords:North American Ice Complex. Ice sheet, Laurentide Ice Sheet, Numerical modelling, Ice streams.
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Download PDF
Publisher Web site:
Publisher statement:NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in 'Quaternary science reviews'. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Quaternary science reviews, 50, 2012, 10.1016/j.quascirev.2012.07.009
Date accepted:No date available
Date deposited:15 August 2013
Date of first online publication:September 2012
Date first made open access:No date available

Save or Share this output

Look up in GoogleScholar