We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

Durham Research Online
You are in:

Philistinism and the preservation of nature.

James, Simon P. (2013) 'Philistinism and the preservation of nature.', Philosophy., 88 (1). pp. 101-114.


It is clear that natural entities can be preserved – they can be preserved because they can be harmed or destroyed, or in various other ways adversely affected. I argue that in light of the rise of scientism and other forms of philistinism, the political, religious, mythic, personal and historical meanings that people find in those entities can also be preserved. Against those who impugn disciplines such as fine arts, philosophy and sociology, I contend that this sort of preservation requires the efforts of those whose work exemplifies the core values of the arts, the humanities and the qualitative social sciences.

Item Type:Article
Full text:(VoR) Version of Record
Download PDF
Publisher Web site:
Publisher statement:Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 2013
Date accepted:No date available
Date deposited:27 August 2013
Date of first online publication:January 2013
Date first made open access:No date available

Save or Share this output

Look up in GoogleScholar