James, Simon P. (2013) 'Philistinism and the preservation of nature.', Philosophy., 88 (1). pp. 101-114.
It is clear that natural entities can be preserved – they can be preserved because they can be harmed or destroyed, or in various other ways adversely affected. I argue that in light of the rise of scientism and other forms of philistinism, the political, religious, mythic, personal and historical meanings that people find in those entities can also be preserved. Against those who impugn disciplines such as fine arts, philosophy and sociology, I contend that this sort of preservation requires the efforts of those whose work exemplifies the core values of the arts, the humanities and the qualitative social sciences.
|Full text:||(VoR) Version of Record|
Download PDF (163Kb)
|Publisher Web site:||http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0031819112000575|
|Publisher statement:||Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 2013|
|Date accepted:||No date available|
|Date deposited:||27 August 2013|
|Date of first online publication:||January 2013|
|Date first made open access:||No date available|
Save or Share this output
|Look up in GoogleScholar|