We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

Durham Research Online
You are in:

Rethinking “Patient Testimony” in the Medical Humanities: The Case of Schizophrenia Bulletin’s First Person Accounts

Woods, A. (2013) 'Rethinking “Patient Testimony” in the Medical Humanities: The Case of Schizophrenia Bulletin’s First Person Accounts.', Journal of literature and science., 6 (1). pp. 38-54.


Narrative, in particular so-called ‘illness narrative,’ constitutes a central focus for medical humanities scholars in literary studies, history, philosophy, anthropology, geography, sociology and, increasingly, the clinical disciplines. Regarded as a form of patient testimony, narrative is also seen as vital to the project of understanding, challenging, and even reconciling the divergence between scientific and experiential accounts of health, illness and medical practice. This article offers a critique of medical humanities approaches to narrative by offering the first sustained engagement with the First Person Accounts published in Schizophrenia Bulletin since 1979. Part one addresses the paratextual dimensions of the First Person Accounts and the editorial policies shaping their publication. Part two explores the nature of the contract implied between author and reader in this ‘genre of insight.’ Finally, this article presents four possible models or modes of reading the First Person Accounts and asks what consequences and commitments arise from their adoption.

Item Type:Article
Full text:(VoR) Version of Record
Download PDF
Publisher Web site:
Publisher statement:This article is published under a Creative Commons CC-BY-NC-ND licence.
Date accepted:No date available
Date deposited:22 December 2013
Date of first online publication:2013
Date first made open access:09 January 2023

Save or Share this output

Look up in GoogleScholar