We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

Durham Research Online
You are in:

Self regulation and learning : evidence from meta-analysis and from classrooms.

Higgins, S. (2013) 'Self regulation and learning : evidence from meta-analysis and from classrooms.', in Self-regulation and dialogue in primary classrooms. Leicester: British Psychological Society, pp. 111-126. BJEP monograph series II: Psychological aspects of education ; current trends. (10 ).


Background. Research indicates that supporting self-regulation and metacognition in learners improves their attainment and wider learning capabilities. However, using this knowledge effectively is challenging. Aims. This paper has two main aims. The first is to make a case for the relative benefits of metacognitive and self-regulatory approaches for improving learning. Comparative data from over 50 meta-analyses of interventions in schools indicates such approaches are more beneficial than other interventions. The second aim is to present data about different kinds of metacognitive thinking in classrooms which was elicited with cartoon templates. Sample and methods. Data about thinking in classrooms is drawn from a sample of 355 pupils, aged 4–15, in 12 schools who were involved in a project which promoted meta-cognition and self-regulation. The completed templates were coded for different kinds of thinking, including metacognitive knowledge and metacognitive skillfulness. A two way ANOVA (gender and age) was conducted to examine the development of thinking across age groups (4–7 year olds; 7–11 year olds; 11–15 year olds). Results. There was an increase in all kinds of thinking recorded on the templates with younger children (4 -11 year olds), but contrary to expectation more complex kinds of thinking were identified less frequently with the 11–15 year olds. Conclusion. There is strong evidence from meta-analysis that metacognition and selfregulation are key dimensions in supporting learning, but there are also indications from classrooms that such approaches are not routinely embedded in schools in a way which takes advantage of learners’ developing capabilities.

Item Type:Book chapter
Full text:Publisher-imposed embargo
(P) Proof
File format - PDF (Copyright agreement prohibits open access to the full-text)
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Download PDF
Publisher Web site:
Date accepted:No date available
Date deposited:13 December 2013
Date of first online publication:2013
Date first made open access:No date available

Save or Share this output

Look up in GoogleScholar