Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

Domestic violence perpetrator programmes : what counts as success ?

Westmarland, N. and Kelly, L. and Chalder-Mills, J. (2010) 'Domestic violence perpetrator programmes : what counts as success ?', London Metropolitan University and Durham University, London and Durham.

Abstract

Whether domestic violence perpetrator programmes ‘work’ is contested by researchers, policy makers and practitioners. Some evaluations have concluded they do reduce violence, whereas others claim they do not and may even make things worse. Much of the disagreement is related to three issues: variations in methodological and analytical approaches; disagreements over the interpretation of data; and differing definitions of what the term ‘works’ means. Whilst there is now extensive literature exploring the methodological questions, rather less attention has been paid to unpicking the latter issue. It is this topic that we address in this briefing note. What does it mean for a programme to ‘work’, to ‘be successful’, to have ‘positive outcomes’, and whose perspectives on these questions should we be mindful of ?

Item Type:Other
Full text:(VoR) Version of Record
Download PDF
(66Kb)
Status:Public
Publisher Web site:http://www.respect.uk.net/data/files/respect_research_briefing_note_1_what_counts_as_success.pdf
Date accepted:No date available
Date deposited:07 January 2014
Date of first online publication:23 October 2010
Date first made open access:No date available

Save or Share this output

Export:
Export
Look up in GoogleScholar