Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

First impressions: Gait cues drive reliable trait judgments

Thoresen, J.C.; Vuong, Q.C.; Atkinson, A.P.

First impressions: Gait cues drive reliable trait judgments Thumbnail


Authors

J.C. Thoresen

Q.C. Vuong



Abstract

Personality trait attribution can underpin important social decisions and yet requires little effort; even a brief exposure to a photograph can generate lasting impressions. Body movement is a channel readily available to observers and allows judgements to be made when facial and body appearances are less visible; e.g., from great distances. Across three studies, we assessed the reliability of trait judgements of point-light walkers and identified motion-related visual cues driving observers’ judgements. The findings confirm that observers make reliable, albeit inaccurate, trait judgements, and these were linked to a small number of motion components derived from a Principal Component Analysis of the motion data. Parametric manipulation of the motion components linearly affected trait ratings, providing strong evidence that the visual cues captured by these components drive observers’ trait judgements. Subsequent analyses suggest that reliability of trait ratings was driven by impressions of emotion, attractiveness and masculinity.

Citation

Thoresen, J., Vuong, Q., & Atkinson, A. (2012). First impressions: Gait cues drive reliable trait judgments. Cognition, 124(3), 261-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.05.018

Journal Article Type Article
Publication Date Sep 1, 2012
Deposit Date Jun 28, 2012
Publicly Available Date Jan 24, 2014
Journal Cognition
Print ISSN 0010-0277
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 124
Issue 3
Pages 261-271
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.05.018
Keywords Bodily motion, Personality, Point-light walkers, Biological motion, Trait impressions, Perceived emotion.

Files

Accepted Journal Article (504 Kb)
PDF

Copyright Statement
NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Cognition. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Cognition, 124(3), September 2012, 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.05.018





You might also like



Downloadable Citations