We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

Durham Research Online
You are in:

Toxic torts : arsenic poisoning in Bangladesh and the legal geographies of responsibility.

Atkins, P. J. and Hassan, M. M. and Dunn, C. E. (2006) 'Toxic torts : arsenic poisoning in Bangladesh and the legal geographies of responsibility.', Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers., 31 (3). pp. 272-285.


Tubewells have been so popular in rural Bangladesh that about 12 million have been installed, yielding water that is convenient, free and low in bacteria. But every fourth well is polluted with arsenic, with the result that millions of people are exposed to a severe environmental hazard. We explore this crisis from the viewpoint of legal geographies. The case of Sutradhar v NERC is taken as an exemplar of a debate about 'proximity' between scientific consultants and aid donors on the one hand, and their clients in poor countries on the other. In short, the article is about the desirability of bringing responsibility into line with supposed generosity.

Item Type:Article
Keywords:Environmental health, Arsenic poisoning, Water, Bangladesh, Legal geography, Proximity, Toxic torts.
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Download PDF
Publisher Web site:
Publisher statement:The definitive version is available at
Date accepted:No date available
Date deposited:02 April 2008
Date of first online publication:September 2006
Date first made open access:No date available

Save or Share this output

Look up in GoogleScholar