We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

Durham Research Online
You are in:

Google's anti-competitive and unfair practices in digital leisure markets.

Chirita, Anca D. (2015) 'Google's anti-competitive and unfair practices in digital leisure markets.', Competition law review., 11 (1). pp. 109-131.


The purpose of this article is to reflect on the critical use of commitments in the Google case and to analyse and review the matrix of facts that have been highlighted in the academic and practitioner literature. Therefore, the core areas of reflection in this contribution are: relevant markets; barriers to entry; network and lock-in effects; dominance; and, potential anticompetitive, as well as unfair practices as regards commercial advertisements. The analysis of the online search-engine market is complemented by the comparative insights offered by the US class action against Google’s Android mobile applications. In the EU, a similar trend is noticeable in the complaining tone of Google’s competitors. When this is coupled with the transitional period of the mandate of the newly appointed Commissioner for Competition and the political sensitivity over the potential to misuse search-engine users’ personal data to serve commercial purposes, such as boosting its advertising revenues, the giant Google swims in uncertain waters.

Item Type:Article
Additional Information:
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Download PDF
Full text:(VoR) Version of Record
Download PDF
Publisher Web site:
Date accepted:01 May 2015
Date deposited:21 October 2014
Date of first online publication:01 July 2015
Date first made open access:No date available

Save or Share this output

Look up in GoogleScholar