Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Sources of bias in outcome assessment in randomised controlled trials: a case study

Ainsworth, H.; Hewitt, C.; Torgerson, C.; Higgins, S.; Wiggins, A.; Torgerson, D.

Sources of bias in outcome assessment in randomised controlled trials: a case study Thumbnail


Authors

H. Ainsworth

C. Hewitt

A. Wiggins



Abstract

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) can be at risk of bias. Using data from a RCT we considered the impact of post-randomisation bias. We compared the trial primary outcome, which was administered blindly, with the secondary outcome which was not administered blindly. 522 children from 44 schools were randomised to receive a one-to-one maths tuition programme that was assessed using two outcome measures. The primary outcome measure was assessed blindly whilst the secondary outcome was delivered by the classroom teacher and therefore this was un-blinded. The effect sizes for primary and secondary outcomes were substantially different (0.33 and 1.11 respectively). Test questions that were similar between the two tests this did not explain the difference. There was greater heterogeneity between schools for the primary outcome, compared with the secondary outcome. We conclude that, in this trial, the difference between the primary and secondary outcomes was likely to have been due to lack of blinding of testers.

Citation

Ainsworth, H., Hewitt, C., Torgerson, C., Higgins, S., Wiggins, A., & Torgerson, D. (2015). Sources of bias in outcome assessment in randomised controlled trials: a case study. Educational Research and Evaluation, 21(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2014.985316

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Oct 14, 2014
Online Publication Date Nov 24, 2014
Publication Date Feb 1, 2015
Deposit Date Nov 6, 2014
Publicly Available Date Mar 29, 2024
Journal Educational Research and Evaluation
Print ISSN 1380-3611
Electronic ISSN 1744-4187
Publisher Taylor and Francis Group
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 21
Issue 1
Pages 3-14
DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2014.985316
Keywords Randomised trials, Methodology, Blinding, Treatment inherent
measures.

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations