Brooks, Thom (2016) 'In defence of Punishment and the unified theory of punishment : a reply.', Criminal law and philosophy., 10 (3). pp. 629-638.
My book, Punishment, has three aims: to provide the most comprehensive and updated examination of the philosophy of punishment available, to advance a new theory—the unified theory of punishment—as a compelling alternative to available theories and to consider the relation of theory to practice. In his recent review article, Mark Tunick raises several concerns with my analysis. I address each of these concerns and argue they rest largely on misinterpretations which I restate and clarify here.
|Keywords:||Expressivism, Hegel, Legal moralism, Retribution, Unified theory of punishment.|
|Full text:||(AM) Accepted Manuscript|
Download PDF (317Kb)
|Publisher Web site:||http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11572-014-9348-8|
|Publisher statement:||The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11572-014-9348-8.|
|Date accepted:||No date available|
|Date deposited:||11 November 2014|
|Date of first online publication:||12 November 2014|
|Date first made open access:||No date available|
Save or Share this output
|Look up in GoogleScholar|