Brooks, Thom (2016) 'In defence of Punishment and the unified theory of punishment : a reply.', Criminal law and philosophy., 10 (3). pp. 629-638.
Abstract
My book, Punishment, has three aims: to provide the most comprehensive and updated examination of the philosophy of punishment available, to advance a new theory—the unified theory of punishment—as a compelling alternative to available theories and to consider the relation of theory to practice. In his recent review article, Mark Tunick raises several concerns with my analysis. I address each of these concerns and argue they rest largely on misinterpretations which I restate and clarify here.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Keywords: | Expressivism, Hegel, Legal moralism, Retribution, Unified theory of punishment. |
| Full text: | (AM) Accepted Manuscript Download PDF (317Kb) |
| Status: | Peer-reviewed |
| Publisher Web site: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11572-014-9348-8 |
| Publisher statement: | The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11572-014-9348-8. |
| Date accepted: | No date available |
| Date deposited: | 11 November 2014 |
| Date of first online publication: | 12 November 2014 |
| Date first made open access: | No date available |
Save or Share this output
| Export: | |
| Look up in GoogleScholar |
