Bueno, Otávio and Vickers, Peter (2014) 'Is science inconsistent?', Synthese., 191 (13). pp. 2887-2889.
There has always been interest in inconsistency in science, not least within science itself as scientists strive to devise a consistent picture of the universe. Some important early landmarks in this history are Copernicus’s criticism of the Ptolemaic picture of the heavens, Galileo’s claim that Aristotle’s theory of motion was inconsistent, and Berkeley’s claim that the early calculus was inconsistent. More recent landmarks include the classical theory of the electron, Bohr’s theory of the atom, and the on-going difficulty of reconciling Einstein’s general relativity and quantum theory. But over the past few decades philosophers have taken a particular and increasing interest in inconsistency in science. In 2002 this culminated in the first collection of articles specifically dedicated to the topic: Inconsistency in Science, edited by Joke Meheus, published by Kluwer, and featuring twelve articles on a range of topics in the philosophy of science and mathematics. Since then philosophic ...
|Full text:||(AM) Accepted Manuscript|
Download PDF (92Kb)
|Publisher Web site:||http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11229-014-0463-9|
|Publisher statement:||The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11229-014-0463-9.|
|Date accepted:||No date available|
|Date deposited:||27 January 2015|
|Date of first online publication:||September 2014|
|Date first made open access:||No date available|
Save or Share this output
|Look up in GoogleScholar|