Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

A search for understanding.

Duffin, J.M. and Simpson, A.P. (2000) 'A search for understanding.', The journal of mathematical behavior., 18 (4). pp. 415-427.

Abstract

We discuss an important breakthrough for us in our search for a technical meaning of “understanding” in mathematics education. In this article, we describe the background to this discovery, the catalyst for the breakthrough, and a concise explanation of our new definition. In discussing the consequences of this definition, both in terms of the theoretical implications for the internal characteristics and external manifestations of understanding with some initial practical consequences for a teacher's attempts to model a learner's understanding, we begin to describe our ongoing search for a more comprehensive theory. Much of our work during the past 5 years has been devoted to developing a theory of learning which accounts for our own experiences as learners, teachers, and researchers. The theory we have developed in which we identify learning experiences as natural, conflicting, or alien, and consider the ways in which learners might respond to them (Duffin & Simpson, 1993) has been used to analyze a number of learning incidents we have encountered (Duffin & Simpson, 1995). In the course of such analyses, we found that the word “understanding” often entered our discussions and eventually, we felt compelled to seek a definition of the word, which would fit within the basic framework of our theory and might enable us to make more sense of the incidents we encountered. The quest for such a definition has occupied us for more than 3 years and we will use this article to explore how we came to our current position. The article is not focussed on understanding, its focus is on the journey we undertook to make sense of a particular term (which happens to be “understanding”) in the context of our on-going development of a personal theory of learning. As such, the article contains almost as much about what we later came to see as mistaken (or to replace) as it does about the terminus of our journey: our current definition of understanding.

Item Type:Article
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Download PDF
(393Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(00)00028-6
Publisher statement:NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in The journal of mathematical behavior. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in The journal of mathematical behavior, 18/4, 2000, 10.1016/S0732-3123(00)00028-6
Date accepted:No date available
Date deposited:12 February 2015
Date of first online publication:2000
Date first made open access:No date available

Save or Share this output

Export:
Export
Look up in GoogleScholar