Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

Comparative law and the ius gentium.

Wheatle, Se-shauna (2014) 'Comparative law and the ius gentium.', Cambridge journal of international and comparative law., 3 (4). pp. 1060-1083.

Abstract

Constitutional principles are sometimes invoked in adjudication as a bridge to foreign law. This article argues that a cosmopolitan approach, such as that advocated by Jeremy Waldron through his ius gentium theory, is useful in accounting for the use of constitutional principles by courts insofar as the commonality of language and methodology surrounding the use of constitutional principles is connected to societal and institutional needs. The article argues that constitutional principles often serve as a connection to foreign law because the principles are applied as representations of a societal need for order and stability. At the same time, the article cautions that transnational judicial dialogue is impacted by compartmentalisation and divergence. Consequently, arguments for a ius gentium must be more cautious and nuanced. As a step in this direction, the article proposes two ideas for modifying the ius gentium theory: conceiving of the ius gentium as an emerging but not yet fully realised system and characterising the ius gentium as a convergence of methodology rather than substantive norms.

Item Type:Article
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Download PDF
(323Kb)
Full text:(VoR) Version of Record
Available under License - Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
Download PDF
(152Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:http://dx.doi.org/10.7574/cjicl.03.04.251
Publisher statement:This article is available under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License.
Date accepted:23 December 2014
Date deposited:17 February 2015
Date of first online publication:30 July 2016
Date first made open access:25 February 2015

Save or Share this output

Export:
Export
Look up in GoogleScholar