We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

Durham Research Online
You are in:

Just war, royal conscience and the crisis of theological counsel in the early seventeenth century.

Reinhardt, Nicole (2014) 'Just war, royal conscience and the crisis of theological counsel in the early seventeenth century.', Journal of early modern history., 18 (5). pp. 495-521.


This article explores how scholastic just war theories and concepts of theological counsel became increasingly problematic in the run-up to the Thirty Years War. It identifies increasing conceptual difficulties due to probabilism, religiously inspired contemporary warfare, and skeptical readings of the Old Testament. Such theoretical problems were exacerbated in the context of the struggle for European hegemony with French pamphleteers starting to ridicule theological discourse in order to denounce Spanish dominance, in particular during the Valtelline crisis. Scholastic just war traditions were so fundamentally discredited that the former royal confessor Caussin was eventually forced to abandon them. Instead he tried to recover theological authority and to safeguard the essence of scholastic just war teachings through a pacified reading of the Old Testament. Though ultimately unsuccessful, his adaptations bear witness to profound changes in the appreciation of the scholastic heritage as well as in the decline of moral theology for political decision-making.

Item Type:Article
Keywords:Nicolas Caussin – Cardinal Richelieu – Valtelline crisis – just war – second scholastics
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Download PDF
Publisher Web site:
Date accepted:No date available
Date deposited:06 March 2015
Date of first online publication:25 July 2014
Date first made open access:25 July 2015

Save or Share this output

Look up in GoogleScholar